Some businesses that sell goods on credit use what is known as a "retention of title" (ROT) clause as part of their trading terms. A basic retention of title clause provides that ownership of the goods supplied does not pass to the customer until full payment has been made - i.e. the supplier retains title. The supplier may reclaim the goods supplied if the customer does not pay for them.
A ROT clause is often referred to as a Romalpa Clause, being named after the leading case in the area, Aluminium Industrie Vaasen B.V. -v- Romalpa Aluminium Ltd.
ROT clauses are generally located on credit applications as part of the standard credit supply terms, but may also be printed on the invoices and statements. Where ever it is located, it must be communicated to and accepted by the customer for it to be enforceable.
The Sales of Goods Acts in the various States provide that title to (ownership of) goods passes "when intended", which usually is interpreted as when possession is passed to the customer. On a credit sale, ownership of an item would usually pass before payment has been received. A ROT clause stops ownership from passing with possession. This gives the supplier some protection when customers cannot pay for the goods.
As the goods still belong to the supplier, they are entitled to get their goods back. A good ROT clause will state that the supplier has the right to enter the customer's premises and recover the goods if the customer does not pay for them. Without this access provision, taking possession of the goods may be difficult or delayed or may be trespass on the customer's property.
No. Some issues are:
1. A supplier must be able to identify what actual goods fall under the terms of the retention of title clause. That is, they must be able to identify the relevant goods and match these to an unpaid invoice covered by the clause.2. A supplier must act within the rights given by the wording of the clause.
3. The goods collected usually have to be ones that were sold under invoices that remain unpaid. Once that invoice is paid, subject to some exceptions, title will pass to the customer and the supplier will not be able to collect them, even if money is owed under other invoices.
4. A supplier will have to determine whether the clause is valid against an external administrator. Clauses that create unregistered charges may be invalid, in whole or in part.
5. The goods will have to be in a collectable condition.
A supplier must be able to identify the goods as ones they supplied, and that were sold under an invoice that remains unpaid. Suppliers with good stock systems usually use serial numbers or other identifying marks and are able to match goods to particular invoices. The onus of proving that the goods are sold under specific invoices lies with the supplier.
The retention of title claim may not be effective if the goods cannot be identified. If the same type of goods have been supplied under two invoices, one that has been paid and one that remains unpaid, the supplier will have to identify which goods were supplied under the unpaid invoice or lose the right to reclaim any goods.
Some matters must be considered before any attempt to collect goods.
1. The goods must be still with the customer. If they have been on-sold to a third party, title would have passed to that party and collection will not be possible. The customer can pass good title to a third party in the normal course of trade. That is, if the goods are no longer there, they cannot be collected.
2. If the goods has been used or improved as part of the manufacturing process, the improved good or the newly manufactured unit may not be recoverable. There are two major possibilities:
(a) The goods are a part of a larger item, being affixed to the larger item (e.g. an engine in a car); or
(b) the goods have been mixed into or applied to another item (e.g. glue used to make particle board).
The Court decides between what is collectable, and what is not, based on the method of affixation:
(a) whether the item is a part of something bigger and but be removed without damage to either item, or
(b) to what extent the item has lost its identity when mixed with other goods.
If the items have simply been attached to something else, but have not lost their identity and can be easily removed, they may be recoverable. It they cannot be separated or have lost their identity, they generally cannot be recovered.
There are 3 common types of ROT clauses, all having slightly different effects on the rights of the supplier to retake possession of goods. These are known as:
1. Title of Goods clauses
2. All Monies clauses
3. Tracing clauses & Fiduciary or Trust Relationships
These are the most basic clause and state that title or ownership does not pass until payment has been made in full. Coupled with a provision to allow access for collection, they allow suppliers to collect goods that were supplied under invoices that remain unpaid, but not goods that were supplied under invoices that have been paid, or collect monies that have been generated from the on-sale of the goods.
These have the same effect as the Title of Goods clause, but also retain title in goods that has been supplied under invoices that have been paid. This clause provides that title to goods does not pass until all indebtedness has been paid. Suppliers will be able to collect any of their goods if there is any current debt, regardless of whether the debts relates to the good collected or not.
These clauses usually are deeded to be unregistered charges and can be difficult to enforce against insolvency practitioners under the Corporations Act. Suppliers also have a problem when the customer reduces their indebtedness to nil at any time. If at any time the customer has paid all outstanding bills, title in all of the goods will pass to the customer. If the supplier attempts to collect goods under later unpaid invoices, they will have to identify the actual goods supplied under those later unpaid invoices or supplied after the account was nil. They cannot collect the earlier goods.
These have the same general provisions of the first two clauses, but also include what are known as "tracing" provisions. Money from the sale of the goods must be kept in a separate bank account on trust for the supplier. This is the trust or fiduciary part. For this type of clause to work, the customer must keep any funds received in a separate bank account or identified as monies held on trust.
If the monies are not kept separately, a properly drafted clause will allow a supplier to trace the proceeds from the on-sale of their goods into the bank account of the customer. For this to be successful, the supplier must be able to show that at least part of the current monies in the customer's bank account was generated from the sale of the goods under the clause.
Yes. Insolvency practitioners will have to deal with retention of title clauses from time to time. They will require information from the supplier before any goods are released. The information will include a copy of the terms and conditions that evidence the clause and copies of all unpaid invoices. This will allow the practitioner to identify and return any items that fall under the conditions of the clause. The supplier is usually involved in this process and can usually be resolved with the cooperation of both parties.
The insolvency practitioners may:
(a) return any goods held by the insolvent customer under a valid retention of title clause; or
(b) with the supplier's consent, sell the goods and pay for any retention of title stock. This generally assists both the practitioner (in attempting to complete work in progress etc.) and the supplier (in selling the goods and having guaranteed payment).
Disclaimer
The enclosed information is of necessity a brief
overview and it is not intended that readers should rely
wholly on the information contained herein. No warranty
express or implied is given in respect of the information
provided and accordingly no responsibility is taken by
Worrells or any member of the firm for any loss resulting
from any error or omission contained within this
fact sheet.
Last Updated: 29.2.2008